Search found 149 matches
- 20 Dec 2011 8:23
- Forum: Job Definition
- Topic: Enforce unique Job Out-Condition names
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4059
kshapley, Defining and enforcing naming standards is a job by itself, and no standard utility is provided to do that job. The best you could do is scanning all your definitions, either from EM or from CTM/SV database (in that case, it is a bit late). To do so, you need to develop SQL code, more part...
- 15 Dec 2011 2:55
- Forum: Job Definition
- Topic: Schedule job every 20 days
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4479
- 09 Dec 2011 12:31
- Forum: Job Definition
- Topic: How to find an ORDERID using a scheduled job?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3246
Bsglover, The orderid of the target job is accessible from the CMR_AJF table. The value returned is numeric, instead of alphanumeric. For example, if your target job has an orderid of abc , the returned value will be 13368. The ctmpsm utility accepts decimal orderids: in that case, the value should ...
- 09 Dec 2011 9:57
- Forum: Job Definition
- Topic: Schedule job every 20 days
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4479
PI_Check, As everyone told you, there is no automatic solution to your problem using control-m calendars. You may use a periodic calendar, as suggested by vassi168, but this will force you to manually input your calendar and update it year after year, which is very boring and error prone. Another so...
- 09 Oct 2011 7:32
- Forum: Job Definition
- Topic: A special job watching Jobs executing
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2350
Soissons, ctmpsm is actually the right source to count your jobs. Given the following input .. ctmpsm -listjob executing Submitted/Executing Jobs ORDERID JOBNAME TYPE ODATE PID RUNCNT -------- ----------------- ----- -------- ---------------- ------ 00000nhy PSVCAL000 TBL 20111008 1 00000ni2 PSVCAL0...
- 12 Sep 2011 2:13
- Forum: Job Definition
- Topic: Run a job Tue-Sat except when Monday a Holiday
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2413
Meanjean, If you have a controlm mainframe available, you can find a solution based on the CTMBLCAL and CTMRCAL utilities. CTMBLCAL combines 2 calendars with “plus”, “minus” and “AND” operators, to produced a resulting calendar. CTMRCAL creates calendars based on the scheduling parameters of the job...
- 07 Sep 2011 7:26
- Forum: Job Definition
- Topic: RBC in Smart Table from Control-M v7
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6859
Futre25, This feature is actually new to V7. The principle is to get a more detailed and more flexible on the global workload. It might be confusing for it might seem to replace and expand the concept of resources. Basically, it acts like queues: You can define a queue to submit jobs, and open/close...
- 02 Sep 2011 12:33
- Forum: Job Definition
- Topic: Push a cyclic job beyond the NewDay
- Replies: 5
- Views: 9148
Soissons, First, don’t be sorry being French. It happens to 60 millions people with no problem, and bad English disease does not affect only the French. You say that every occurrence of your job is important. In that case, how can you manage the rerun of any failing execution with your job being cyc...
- 02 Sep 2011 11:15
- Forum: Job Definition
- Topic: RBC in Smart Table from Control-M v7
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6859
Futre25, The concept of scheduling groups has been introduced in V6.00 and includes several interesting features, among which the scheduling tags. Scheduling tags combine scheduling parameters as you can find in the traditional “Scheduling” tab of your jobs definition. You can define as many schedul...
- 31 Aug 2011 9:54
- Forum: Job Definition
- Topic: RBC in Smart Table from Control-M v7
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6859
futre25, Which version do you come from? RBC are nothing else than the former scheduling tags, which have been named so from version 6.0.0 till 6.4.0. According to your background in that forum, one can beleive you have been using at least one 6.xx version. If you never used scheduling groups - whic...
- 26 May 2011 8:06
- Forum: Job Definition
- Topic: mass update of condition in the steps tab
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2545
be_incontrol, I noticed you run 630. In 640 the structure of the EM tables has changed. The following sql request should do the job (supplied in MS/SQL format, against the EM database) update DEF_DO_COND set CONDITION = replace(CONDITION,'_Dv','_Ut') where CONDITION like '%/_Dv' escape '/' Additiona...
- 12 May 2011 10:05
- Forum: Monitoring
- Topic: How to find how many jobs were loaded into AJF on a day
- Replies: 1
- Views: 6545
abhishek_82, The complexity depends on what kind of information you intend to obtain. If you want an instant info on the number of jobs loaded, the GUI is enough: Just build a viewpoint which includes the ODATE as a high hierarchical level, right click on the block representing the current ODATE and...
- 11 May 2011 5:31
- Forum: Job Definition
- Topic: Order/Force with Hold disable.
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4851
futre25, Please be a bit more detailed in your explanations. You say “I have disabled …” then “I have not changed anything” in the same line, which is what I would call a contradiction. What are exactly the symptoms? Under which environment do you observe the problem: desktop, EM GUI, ctmorder, dail...
- 26 Apr 2011 6:19
- Forum: Job Definition
- Topic: RERUN FAIL JOB after 120 SECONDS
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3827
There is no easy way to send an alert on the first failure only. It is possible, but I don’t believe it is our case for now. The best is to specify alarm and rerun together On Stmt * Code NOTOK Do Rerun Do Shout <blabla> The shout will be sent every time the job fails. You can limit the number of au...
- 23 Apr 2011 9:45
- Forum: Job Definition
- Topic: Workaround needed for Late time in Post Proc tab
- Replies: 5
- Views: 9148
be_incontrol , There is basically no smart solution to your problem, for the time frame for shout is from 00 :00 to 23 :59, and is strictly a HHMM on 4 chars (no day type delay) 1°) There is a possibility, available since version 630 and called Time Synonyms, and which can extend the time frame from...