Search found 52 matches
- 15 Oct 2009 12:58
- Forum: Scripts
- Topic: Help on ctmcreate
- Replies: 4
- Views: 15380
Bobby, which version of the agent and server are you running? I am running a 6.3 and 6.4 server with 6.3 agents. A ctmcreate issued at either the agent or server side does issue an RC of 1 upon on unsuccessful run. I would verify that your server and agents are fully patched. If that is the case, I ...
- 01 Sep 2009 7:22
- Forum: Exploitation / Operation
- Topic: SQL server
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4199
Re: SQL server
Hello all! We would like to know what is the purpose of the SQL server? Is it really necessary? I mean, is the write operation on the Control-M/EM server not enough? Maybe it's a stupid question, but we really don't understand the utility of the process write and upload. Is this just a space questi...
- 24 Jun 2009 6:56
- Forum: Job Definition
- Topic: In/Out Conditions
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2561
What he meant was the conditions are not managed or stored at the EM level, but at the Control-M/server or datacenter level. The comparable tool on CTM/Server side is ctmldnrs. If you look in the manuals you will find this utility and to emulate maybe conditions, you will need to run the utility twi...
- 08 Jun 2009 5:38
- Forum: Scripts
- Topic: ecs util problems
- Replies: 3
- Views: 11527
There's nothing wrong with the file you are getting. To accommodate greater flexibility in the data, BMC changed the field and record delimiters in the database. All the data that you are expecting is still there, it is just separated by the new delimiter sets. You can still parse the data, just use...
- 29 May 2009 4:07
- Forum: Control-M Enterprise Manager
- Topic: CONTROL-M/Desktop for Linux?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4705
- 22 May 2009 2:19
- Forum: Exploitation / Operation
- Topic: About physical data model
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3440
- 21 May 2009 8:04
- Forum: Job Definition
- Topic: Unix Control M, job selection criteria
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2852
- 21 May 2009 8:01
- Forum: Control-M Agents
- Topic: Will ControlM agent run on Linux RH 5?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4471
- 01 May 2009 4:00
- Forum: Control-M Control Module
- Topic: Incomplete Utilities for Control-M 6.3.0.1 Aix
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3463
Just wanted to share a little extra information with everyone. Not all the utilities are available from the agent as opposed to the server, but some can be added. As an example, ctmwhy. The ctmwhy utility can be added by creating a soft link to the ctmut executable in the agent's ctm/exe directory s...
- 23 Feb 2009 6:05
- Forum: Job Definition
- Topic: Order Job without Force not accepting new jobs.
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2110
- 11 Dec 2008 6:29
- Forum: Control-M Enterprise Manager
- Topic: Passing a Condition between multiple Enterprise Managers
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2493
I guess the easiest way I can think of would be to use a common agent machine. Using a single server you can load two agents, one pointing to the development environment and the other pointing to the production environment. You can then define a development job which would execute a ctmcontb cmdline...
- 20 Nov 2008 4:26
- Forum: Job Definition
- Topic: How to launch a perl script in JOB mode ?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3280
Sorry, but it really can't be done. Perl is not really a "scripting" language. Unlike shell scripts of various kinds, PERL is "compiled" at the time of submission. Therefore the text of each line isn't passed one by one like other scripting languages to an interpreter but the entire script is conver...
- 29 Oct 2008 4:04
- Forum: Job Definition
- Topic: Advanced analyzing of CONTROL-M sysout?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2475
Okay, for the first piece: ON stmt=* code=* DO NOTOK ON stmt="specific line or *" code="*6250*" DO OK As the ON functions are top down, the initial one sets the job to NOTOK, and IF the second one matches, the job will end okay. Otherwise, the job will finish NOTOK. For the second piece, autoedits c...
- 23 Oct 2008 6:38
- Forum: Control-M Server
- Topic: hi / urgent
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7451
- 08 Oct 2008 1:46
- Forum: Job Definition
- Topic: Running a job only if it's predecessors overlap?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3628
Here's an option, but it's just a quick off the top of my head thing. I doubt it's the best that we can come up with. Define a predecessor job (pjob) to job2. The job will run the command: ctmpsm -listjob executing | grep job1 The on statement for the job will be: ON stmt=* code=COMPSTAT=0 DO ForceJ...