Welcome to Scheduler-Usage Communaut?e freelances en informatique

Languages
Select Interface Language:

English French

Add to Google

Modules
 Infos :
 Home
 Search

 Members :
 Forums
 Downloads
 Uploads
 Manage your Account

 Community :
 Register yourself!
 Other Links
 Recommand that Site

 Divers :
 Top 10


  
Scheduler-Usage: Forums

Controlm-M Usage :: View topic - Control-M Vs CA Autosys
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Control-M Vs CA Autosys

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Controlm-M Usage Forum Index -> Autosys
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Control-M vs Autosys. Which is a better tool?
Control-M
100%
 100%  [ 5 ]
Autosys
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Neither
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Other
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Total Votes : 5

Author Message
kijenketile
Nouveau
Nouveau


User
(Level 0)

Joined: Jan 29, 2007
Posts: 4
Location: Minneapolis, MN U.S.A

PostPosted: 24 Jun 2008 5:40    Post subject: Control-M Vs CA Autosys Reply with quote

I work for a company that is using CA Autosys. We were acquired by them in 2005. We were using Control-M version 6.1.03 for our batch scheduling/Monitoring before we transitioned over to Autosys. I have always felt that Control-M is a more robust, efficient and scalable tool in comparison to Autosys. However, I have just a few things to compare the two tools. I am not sure if any of you have any exposure to Autosys, but I was looking to find out if you are aware of any inadequacies of Autosys that I can incorporate in my list. I am trying to make a presentation to show some of the functionalities of Control-M not avaialble in CA Autosys. Any feedback will be appreciated. Thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Dilbert
Nouveau
Nouveau


User
(Level 0)

Joined: Jan 10, 2007
Posts: 181
Location: Zagreb, Croatia

PostPosted: 24 Jun 2008 4:34    Post subject: Re: Control-M Vs CA Autosys Reply with quote

Go to BMC page and ask BMC Sales Support abou that?
Once ?ive seen Sales guide and compariosn between CONTROL-M and UC4. Ask BMC Sales if they have anything (white paper, comparison table...) for CONTROL-M and CA.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fyot
Nouveau
Nouveau


Administrator
(Level 3)

Joined: Apr 26, 2005
Posts: 614
Location: PARIS

PostPosted: 24 Jun 2008 6:26    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi,

You will find some others informations to compare following that site Job-scheduling.org
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Derick
Nouveau
Nouveau


Administrator
(Level 3)

Joined: Jun 22, 2007
Posts: 26

PostPosted: 24 Jun 2008 7:11    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi,

I've been implementing, supporting and using Control-M for 10 years.

I've also received training on Autosys and did testing on it for comparison between the 2 tools.

I and my colleagues at that time, all came to the same conclusion. Control-M is hands-down the best tool, as matter of fact, because Autosys's user interface, functionality and architecture are so archaic, there is actually no comparison!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jayant
Nouveau
Nouveau


User
(Level 0)

Joined: Jun 04, 2010
Posts: 2

PostPosted: 05 Jun 2010 3:53    Post subject: Comparing UC4 and AutoSys Reply with quote

Can someone let me know how exactly UC4 compares with AutoSys. I had an opportunity to see UC4 working a few days back and it appeared that it has a scripting language of its own that does not seem to exist in autoSys. This is good and bad. Good in the sense that we can perform lot of work using the scripts but bad in the sense that typically it is a scheduling tool and the operations resources are not developers. This will force operations to learn little bit of developers job so from the roles and responsibility perspective it is not good for operations

Since autoSys does not seem to provide scripting this issue does not exist there (to my knowledge)

any comments/opinions?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Indrashish
Nouveau
Nouveau


User
(Level 0)

Joined: Jul 12, 2010
Posts: 1

PostPosted: 13 Jul 2010 6:32    Post subject: UC4 Appworx and Autosys Reply with quote

I have worked on Appworx ( now bought by UC4 systems ) and I would say that the functionalities though lesser are more friendly to use form a Java based GUI rather than from an Autosys Regular command line ( now that we have the WCC and the WCC thin client in its Beta version - 11.3 ) .
I would say that Appworx integrates into the ERP applications a little shabbily and usually there are long PREDWAITS holding up big workstreams .
The regular batch jobs , datawarehousing etc works OK.

Autosys is more robust as it is command line and the end user doesnt have to worry about just another heavy java based application consuming desktop/laptop resources.
Autosys offers more flexibility and varied job types and conditions as well as the interfaces that integrate into ERP's like SAP and PeopleSoft are good . I am not sure of the Oracle APps interfaces and extensions .

The beauty in Appworx was with the ease and comfort on administration from the GUI with just a DBA access and the usage and ease of creation of Subscripted Variables , logins and the beauty of a traditional ROLE BASED ACCESS MODEL .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Controlm-M Usage Forum Index -> Autosys All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Freelance Informatique  Google  Web site powered by PHP-Nuke 

The site created by Franck YOT. Images, logo, content and trademarks about Control-M products are property of BMC Software.
All the comments are property of their posters. Images, logo, content and design are © copyright by Scheduler-Usage.com. All Rights Reserved